A federal
appeals court has affirmed monetary sanctions assessed against an Intellectual
Property lawyer who represents a maker of adult films in a series of copyright-infringement-by-downloading cases.
U.S.
District Court Judge David C. Godbey in Dallas had ruled in January that
attorney Evan Stone of Denton, Texas had abused
the discovery process, and termed him a “rogue attorney" with "staggering chutzpah" in a blistering decision.
In a July
12 ruling, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District
Court's sanctions levied against Stone.
Stone
represents Germany’s Mick Haig Productions E.K. against a large number
of unnamed "John Doe" Defendants who stand accused of downloading
Haig’s “Der Gute Onkel” film without authorization.
Stone, no stranger to controversy, was depicted strangling pirates near scantily-clad porn stars in a recent Dallas Observer article.
The District Court
had appointed attorneys from Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Citizen as "ad litem" attorneys to represent the interests of the John Doe defendants
and it was these lawyers who had sought the sanctions in District Court. The
sanctions included attorneys' fees of more than $22,000, and $500 per day for
each day Stone failed to comply with a court order.
Stone
filed an appeal to the 5th Circuit, arguing the sanctions were unjustified and
that the court-appointed attorneys lacked standing to seek them.
The
appeals court flatly rejected Stone's argument. It specifically held
that “no miscarriage of justice will result from the sanctions” that were
imposed “as a result of Stone’s flagrant violation” of court rules.
The appeals
court said Stone committed the violations by using the subpoena power of the
court to find the identity of anonymous Internet users “then
shaming or intimidating them to settle for thousands of dollars” each.
The
appeal is captioned Mick Haig Productions E.K. v. Does 1-670, 11- 10977, U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (New Orleans). The District Court case
is Mick Haig Products E.K. v. Does 1-670, U.S. District Court, Northern
District of Texas (Dallas).
The tactic
of using the threat of John Doe subpoena discovery against pornography
downloaders has come under recent fire in high-profile class
action litigations against a number of adult film companies.
No comments:
Post a Comment