By Hellerick (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons |
The New York Times is reporting that the US Department of Justice
is seeking to have Richard O’Dwyer, a 24-year-old college student from Great
Britain, extradited on criminal charges of copyright infringement. The possible punishment: 10 years in a federal penitentiary.
In 2008,
O’Dwyer first set up a website, TVShack.net, which allowed users to search
for and link to other sites, including ones that the federal authorities argue
showed pirated movies and television shows.
The US
government shut down TVShack.net in summer 2010. But Mr.
O’Dwyer was apparently unbowed. TVShack.net had been growing in
popularity, and it made about $230,000 from advertising over the course of two
years, federal prosecutors claim.
“America?
They have nothing to do with me,” Mr. O’Dwyer had declared, according to his
mother. He then subsequently reopened his site as TVShack.cc, which
he reckoned was beyond the reach of the United States. He was wrong.
A few
months later came a knock on the door from the British police. A judge
ruled that Mr. O’Dwyer would not be prosecuted in Britain. Instead, the
US Department of Justice would seek to extradite him.
Prosecutors
also claim that O'Dwyer was well aware that the material was copyrighted.
They cite an announcement on TVShack that urged users to be patient with
download times because they were “saving quite a lot of money (especially when
putting several visits to the theater or seasons together).”
The British
home secretary has approved the extradition order and reaffirmed recently that she
would let the order stand. O’Dwyer has appealed and a hearing in British
courts is expected this fall.
Why on Earth would the British Government allow one of their citizens to be exported to be charged with a criminal offence when it is only a civil case in Britain?
ReplyDeleteRegards
Agrodut Mandal
Proofreading Service UK